A Reply to Dr. Lightfoot's Essays Part 11
[28:5] _Ibid._ ii, p. 413.
[29:1] _Der Johann. Ursp. des viert. Evang._ 1874, pp. 204-7.
[29:2] _Einl. N.T._ p. 625.
[30:1] In regard to one other point, I may say that, so far from being silent about the presence of a form of the Logos doctrine in the Apocalypse with which Dr. Lightfoot reproaches me, I repeatedly point out its existence, as, for instance, _S.R._ ii. pp. 255, 273, 278, &c., and I also show its presence elsewhere, my argument being that the doctrine not only was not originated by the fourth Gospel, but that it had already been applied to Christianity in N.T. writings before the composition of that work.
[30:2] _S.R._ ii. 421.
[30:3] _Contemporary Review_, 12 f. [_ibid._ p. 17 f.]
[31:1] Dr. Lightfoot will find the pa.s.sage to which I refer, more especially p. 241, line 4, commencing with the words, "Nur zwei neuere Ausleger ahnen die einfache Wahrheit."
[31:2] _S.R._ 421 f.
[32:1] _Works_, ed. Pitman, x. 339 f.; _Horae et Talm._ p. 938.
[32:2] _Chron. Synopse d. vier. Evv._ p. 256, Anm. 1.
[32:3] _Bibl. Comm., Das. Ev. n. Joh._, umgearb. Ebrard ii. 1, p. 122 f.
[32:4] _Kurzgef. ex. Handbuch N.T._ i. 3, p. 84.
[32:5] _Einl. N.T._ ii. 194 f. Hug more strictly applies the name to the sepulchre where the bones of Joseph were laid (Josh. xxiv. 32).
[32:6] _Bibelwerk_, iv. 219.
[32:7] _Die Zeugnisse_, p. 21.
[32:8] _Comm. sur l'Ev. de St. Jean_, i. p. 475 f.
[32:9] _Einl. N.T._ p. 211.
[32:10] _Zeitschr. gesammt. Luth. Theol. u. Kirche_, 1856, p. 240 ff.
[32:11] _Die Joh. Schriften_, i. p. 181, Anm. 1; _Jahrb. bibl. Wiss._ viii. p. 255 f.; cf. _Gesch. v. Isr._ v. p. 348, Anm. 1.
[32:12] _Das Ev. Joh._ p. 107.
[32:13] _Comm. Ev. n. Joh._ p. 188 f.
[33:1] _Comm. Ev. des Joh._ i. p. 577 f.
[33:2] _Jahrb. bibl. Wiss._ viii. p. 255 f.
[33:3] _Die Joh. Schr._ i. p. 181, Anm. 1.
[33:4] _Authorship and Hist. Char. of Fourth Gospel_, 1872, p. 92.
[33:5] Mr. Sanday adds in a note here: "This may perhaps be called the current explanation of the name. It is accepted as well by those who deny the genuineness of the Gospel as by those who maintain it. Cf.
Keim, i. 133. But there is much to be said for the identification with El Askar, &c." _Authorship and Hist. Char. of Fourth Gospel_, p. 93, note 1.
[34:1] _Life of Christ_, i. p. 206, note 1.
[34:2] _La Geographie du Tulmud_, p. 170.
[34:3] Smith's _Dictionary of the Bible_, iii. p. 1395 f.
[36:1] _Bampton Lect._ 1865, 2nd edit. p. 4.
[36:2] _S.R._ i. p. 61 ff.
[37:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 19 [_ibid._ p. 26 f.]
[37:2] _Three Essays on Religion_, p. 216 f.
[38:1] _Three Essays on Religion_, p. 234.
[38:2] _Ibid._ p. 219.
[39:1] _S.R._ ii. p. 477.
[40:1] This appeared as the Preface to the 6th edition.
[45:1] _Contemporary Review_, January 1875, p. 1 ff. (_Ibid._ p. 32 ff.)
[45:2] _S.R._ i. p. 212.
[46:1] _Contemporary Review_, January 1875, p. 172 [_ibid._ p. 36].
[46:2] _Ibid._ p. 183 [_ibid._ p. 51].
[48:1] _Contemporary Review_, January 1875, p. 173 [_ibid._ p. 38].
[49:1] I regret very much that some ambiguity in my language (_S.R._ i.
p. 483) should have misled, and given Dr. Lightfoot much trouble. I used the word "quotation" in the sense of a use of the Epistle of Peter, and not in reference to any one sentence in Polycarp. I trust that in this edition I have made my meaning clear.
[50:1] Cf. _H.E._ iii. 3, 4, 18, 24, 25, &c. &c.
[50:2] _Ibid._ ii. 15, vi. 14.
[50:3] _Ibid._ v. 8.
[50:4] _Ibid._ vi. 25.
[51:1] _Contemporary Review_, January 1875, p. 181 [_ibid._ p. 48].
[51:2] By a slip of the pen Dr. Lightfoot refers to Irenaeus, _Adv.